I just wondered if it was a faux pas in the same way that wearing a belt with morning dress would be (even though this wouldn't necessarily be noticeable).
I'm a size 31" with a 32" inside leg. The problem is that morning trousers don't have cuffs which can be let out for the extra length, so all the vintage ones I have found are too short for me as a result.
I have the same problem - I'm a touch shorter over all and a lot wider than your good self, but yes - 32" inside leg here too. I found a beautiful pair in a vintage shop in Glasgow last year. I don't claim expertise, but I would have thought early 40s, maybe late 30s. About 2" too short in the leg for me. Bah.
I just wondered if it was a faux pas in the same way that wearing a belt with morning dress would be (even though this wouldn't necessarily be noticeable).
I'm a size 31" with a 32" inside leg. The problem is that morning trousers don't have cuffs which can be let out for the extra length, so all the vintage ones I have found are too short for me as a result.