Rooster said:Pretty obvious in the lapels alone....look at the belly in the vintage suit lapels. And , I might add, that 30's suit you could wear to a rastlin' match and not feel restricted in any movement, they used to know how to make a suit for active folks.
Hmm. The lapels are obvious, but peak lapels will always have more belly and a bit more width, especially in a dinner jacket.
The movement, well I don't really know what you mean. The armholes are identical if not slightly higher in the modern suit, and the extra bit of drape in the chest makes the jacket move quite a bit freer. More than anything, other than the lapels, the lines of the two jackets are very, very similar, although the modern one was made for me and obviously fits better.
Anyway, the point is not that this suit is a copy of a vintage suit, it is not. I don't happen to like the vintage look as much as I do appreciate some details that were done at other points but are not done now. The point is that simply the age or era of a garment means a lot less than the cut and construction of it.