Baron Kurtz
I'll Lock Up
- Messages
- 12,784
Hi Bookster,
I, for one, am glad you've contributed. I think you've - at least in your answer to my very specific question re: the label when the auction was running - been very straight up on the whole.
I don't care about the profit (congrats :eusa_clap ). (To be frank i was bidding on the original badly listed auction so that i could sell it on for profit, as i often do. I have just this evening done so [huh] ) My general profit range is about 100%, but that's because i only buy sure-things, and i'm not making my living out of vintage clothing. I can choose to be picky.
But, I am truly appalled at the removal of the label. Adding to what i have already said, it shows such a disregard for the tailor who originally made the piece, the labour that went into sch a fine piece, that it almost beggars belief that anyone in the clothing trade could do such a thing. It's a sad indictment of the whole trade, to be quite honest. The original buyer, who apparently removed the label, should think seriously about their morals. You, of course, have to take the suit on its merits when it arrives on your doorstep. It would not be a leap of the imagination to think this suit was Edwardian. Clearly it is not, given the (now gone) label, but without the label Edwardian is the obvious conclusion. However, someone is at real fault here. I mean, is removing a label to make a suit seem older any different to taking a label out of a wrecked old suit and sewing it into another one to make it seem older than it is?
bk
I, for one, am glad you've contributed. I think you've - at least in your answer to my very specific question re: the label when the auction was running - been very straight up on the whole.
I don't care about the profit (congrats :eusa_clap ). (To be frank i was bidding on the original badly listed auction so that i could sell it on for profit, as i often do. I have just this evening done so [huh] ) My general profit range is about 100%, but that's because i only buy sure-things, and i'm not making my living out of vintage clothing. I can choose to be picky.
But, I am truly appalled at the removal of the label. Adding to what i have already said, it shows such a disregard for the tailor who originally made the piece, the labour that went into sch a fine piece, that it almost beggars belief that anyone in the clothing trade could do such a thing. It's a sad indictment of the whole trade, to be quite honest. The original buyer, who apparently removed the label, should think seriously about their morals. You, of course, have to take the suit on its merits when it arrives on your doorstep. It would not be a leap of the imagination to think this suit was Edwardian. Clearly it is not, given the (now gone) label, but without the label Edwardian is the obvious conclusion. However, someone is at real fault here. I mean, is removing a label to make a suit seem older any different to taking a label out of a wrecked old suit and sewing it into another one to make it seem older than it is?
bk