very ugly!I see them often lately, and I'm considering, how do you think of the rear pocket?
how do you think of the rear pocket?
I am new to research military collectibles, but The original P44 pants go for huge money. I like the odd look of them, I’ve bought a pair from Bronson.These originated as the USMC P44 utility pant; the rear pocket was specifically designed to carry a waterproof poncho, which would, I suppose, offer a cushioned seat. I've never known them to be popular as eithers surplus or repro wear for civilians - and don't think much of the idea either. I have no idea what's currently mainstream fashionable, tbh - most people I se daily, including students, dress little different to what people were wearing twenty odd years ago unless they're headed out for the night, and even then...
It looks like the pocket you would use to store your dog’s pooIt looks ridiculous and I don't see the point. You can't put anything in it unless you're going to stand up all day.
I have a couple of pairs of them, in different variations from different repro makers. Bronson are good generally and I like their monkey pants. They did a run of modified ones with front pockets, lowering the side cargo pockets to make room them. I put nothing in the back pocket. The side pockets tend to spill contents because they are so loose and baggy and big. They are good for stashing a lot of stuff but not well organized or secure. But they are part of the evolutionary heritage of military fatigue pants and they look gnarly. Even though they are not very practical I have a soft spot for them. I just put up with the odd pockets as best I can.OK I went on with my purchase because it clearly stirs emotion in people
honestly I don't really care much for the back pocket, but the side cargo pockets are just at perfect location