Want to buy or sell something? Check the classifieds
  • The Fedora Lounge is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

is mine fake m 65?

Lee kh

New in Town
Messages
1
I bought So Sew Styles M 65 2 days ago. it looks same as my john ownbay m 65. However, I discovered mine has wrog label.
f98f976c17a29b435ecbe19d13e36a48.jpg
 

Flightengineer

Practically Family
Messages
581
Location
RF
Looks like commercial lable for M65 made for civil market, not like GI.
There is never inscription "made in USA" on army issued M51/65.
Perhaps this is not a fake, but a jacket produced not for the military.
If you will show photo of this jacket, its zippers and other details and also a service label, it will be possible to say more accurately.
 
Last edited:

Peacoat

*
Bartender
Messages
6,454
Location
South of Nashville
So-Sew was (is?) a contractor that supplied field jackets to the DOD. May still have a contract.

The label in your jacket is similar to other labels in jackets made for the DOD by So-Sew. In the issue jackets I haven't seen the term, Made In USA, as noted by @Flightengineer above. In the military labels I have seen, Centre, Alabama is not noted. Also the contract number prefix is suspect. Contract numbers started in 1953 with the DA prefix. The current prefix, as far as I know, is the SPO prefix. There has never been a DAC prefix, unless it is brand new.

Two examples of So-Sew military labels are shown below.

So, my money is on this jacket being made for the civilian market, probably using the same materials and specs as used by So-Sew for its military contract. No reason to consider it a "fake."
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0801.jpg
    IMG_0801.jpg
    406.8 KB · Views: 5,379
  • images.jpg
    images.jpg
    8.7 KB · Views: 3,233

Flightengineer

Practically Family
Messages
581
Location
RF
Absolutely agree.
I had and have many M43 /51/65 jackets, they were all GI, and I saw many labels.
One of my M65 also So-Sew.
All exactly so - nothing to add to what was Peacoat said.
 

Attachments

  • 20160527_173303_783x587 (1).jpg
    20160527_173303_783x587 (1).jpg
    149.7 KB · Views: 8,268

Atticus Finch

Call Me a Cab
Messages
2,718
Location
Coastal North Carolina, USA
I don’t hold myself out as an expert on field jackets, but I do know a bit about military specification tags. I agree with both gentlemen, above. So-sew was a military contractor during the Vietnam War era. They had contracts to make the M-65, M-51 (there was a 1968, M-51 in Aggressor Green) and other field jackets. But the tag on your jacket lacks a DSA, DLA or SPO number. The M-65 was produced from 1965 until the late 1990s...so the specification tag on any issued M-65 would almost certainly contain a number beginning with one of the above prefixes.

But this in no way makes your jacket “Fake”. It is probably a real M-65 that was made by a real military contractor and sold on the civilian market. Alpha Industries has done exactly this with their jackets for decades.

My verdict (): Real but not military.

AF
 
Messages
12,969
Location
Germany
To me, the above jacket looks like Canvas-weave, instead of M65s well known twill-weave.

Were sometimes Canvas-woven M65 on the market??
 

Forum statistics

Threads
109,249
Messages
3,077,257
Members
54,183
Latest member
UrbanGraveDave
Top