Fedord Spaniard
One of the Regulars
- Messages
- 184
- Location
- New York City
Horrible movies, and the people who get duped into waching them...(on the next Geraldo)lol
This thread is for the members that want to vent about movies that disappointed them after watching.
Ever have a movie you were looking forward to.... but then after seeing it, you would have prefered to watch paint dry instead?
This is the thread to be Siskel & Ebert or Ebert & Roper or whatever it is now..... And discuss those wastes of celluloid...
Vintage and modern movies or any kninds of movies are welcome....we can discuss View Master discs too if you would like hahahhaah.
Ill go first,
for me it was Superman Returns. Over 2hrs and 40 Mins ill never get back ever... thats including the money i "donated" to the theatre to see this thinglol . I had no problem with the actors at all... it was the writing for me.
I found so many things wrong with that movie... heres are some of the things that im talking about,
First the costume : the cape's and boots' red made them look like a fruit roll up. The blue have little "S" carved into it. the blue part has little "S" pores.
The "S" shield was too small compared to the modern standard comic book counterpart or silver-bronze age counter part. The Belt had an "S" on it.
I guess it wasnt enough with all those other "S" on this suit(like the "s" pores) that maybe the producers thought the viewers wouldnt know the chracter portrayed was supposed to be Superman.
In this movie Superman has a son and the kid has powers too...
Superman becomes a stalker by watching Lois Lane's home life with her husband.
In this movie Superman just flies away like Magneto instead of pushing himself off the ground like all other incarnations of the character.
What bothered me the most was the way kryptonite was portrayed in this movie..... example:
In all incarnations of Superman comic books, TV, Movies, Animations...whenever hes exposed to Kryptonite he just hits the ground in pain and cant do anything.
Just the mention of Kryptonite gets him thinking twice. You telling Superman you have Kryptonite is like a child being told "im going to get the belt" Kryptonite is Superman's time out.
But O no, not in this movie... In this movie he can be exposed to it and be stabbed by it. While Luthor stabbed Supes, he broke off a piece of Kryptonite and left it inside Supes.
You would think that wouldve killed him, but no not in this movie. After the Kryptonite splinter, Superman is able to pick up an island of Kryptonite with his hands and go into space with it.
His backlash after that was just that he passed out....for a day..must be those wild nights at the Fortress...
Thats just some of my complaints on that movie. How is it that Bryan Singer and his writing team can make good Marvel movies but then turn around and rape a powerful DC Comics franchise of its dignity...
hahaahaha Maybe theres a conspiracy and Marvel has Singer and his crew out to get DC Comics...
In my opinion Christopher Reeve is the one and only true Superman/Clark Kent.
Reeve's acting is what sold that a man can fly...thats before all the CG stuff you see most movies now adays.
Im sure for some of you your Superman is one of these: Kirk Alyn or Bud Collyer (voice in the 1940's rotoscope animation and filmations), George Reeves or Danny Dark (super friends/ super powers team) etc.
Well thats one movie for me... Transformers 2007 is another one but youve heard enough with this movie so ill spare you hahaha
This thread is for the members that want to vent about movies that disappointed them after watching.
Ever have a movie you were looking forward to.... but then after seeing it, you would have prefered to watch paint dry instead?
This is the thread to be Siskel & Ebert or Ebert & Roper or whatever it is now..... And discuss those wastes of celluloid...
Vintage and modern movies or any kninds of movies are welcome....we can discuss View Master discs too if you would like hahahhaah.
Ill go first,
for me it was Superman Returns. Over 2hrs and 40 Mins ill never get back ever... thats including the money i "donated" to the theatre to see this thinglol . I had no problem with the actors at all... it was the writing for me.
I found so many things wrong with that movie... heres are some of the things that im talking about,
First the costume : the cape's and boots' red made them look like a fruit roll up. The blue have little "S" carved into it. the blue part has little "S" pores.
The "S" shield was too small compared to the modern standard comic book counterpart or silver-bronze age counter part. The Belt had an "S" on it.
I guess it wasnt enough with all those other "S" on this suit(like the "s" pores) that maybe the producers thought the viewers wouldnt know the chracter portrayed was supposed to be Superman.
In this movie Superman has a son and the kid has powers too...
Superman becomes a stalker by watching Lois Lane's home life with her husband.
In this movie Superman just flies away like Magneto instead of pushing himself off the ground like all other incarnations of the character.
What bothered me the most was the way kryptonite was portrayed in this movie..... example:
In all incarnations of Superman comic books, TV, Movies, Animations...whenever hes exposed to Kryptonite he just hits the ground in pain and cant do anything.
Just the mention of Kryptonite gets him thinking twice. You telling Superman you have Kryptonite is like a child being told "im going to get the belt" Kryptonite is Superman's time out.
But O no, not in this movie... In this movie he can be exposed to it and be stabbed by it. While Luthor stabbed Supes, he broke off a piece of Kryptonite and left it inside Supes.
You would think that wouldve killed him, but no not in this movie. After the Kryptonite splinter, Superman is able to pick up an island of Kryptonite with his hands and go into space with it.
His backlash after that was just that he passed out....for a day..must be those wild nights at the Fortress...
Thats just some of my complaints on that movie. How is it that Bryan Singer and his writing team can make good Marvel movies but then turn around and rape a powerful DC Comics franchise of its dignity...
hahaahaha Maybe theres a conspiracy and Marvel has Singer and his crew out to get DC Comics...
In my opinion Christopher Reeve is the one and only true Superman/Clark Kent.
Reeve's acting is what sold that a man can fly...thats before all the CG stuff you see most movies now adays.
Im sure for some of you your Superman is one of these: Kirk Alyn or Bud Collyer (voice in the 1940's rotoscope animation and filmations), George Reeves or Danny Dark (super friends/ super powers team) etc.
Well thats one movie for me... Transformers 2007 is another one but youve heard enough with this movie so ill spare you hahaha
And has James Woods ever appeared in a worthwhile movie? No. He couldn't hack it as a leading man and he was even worse as a character actor, which is on full display in Casino. Don't even bother coming up with "good" examples of his acting, there aren't any.
