binkmeisterRick
A-List Customer
- Messages
- 477
- Location
- The Island of Misfit Hats
I guess I'll just have to be a substandard gentleman with my vintage Parkers, Eversharps, Shaeffers and Esterbrooks. I'm okay with that.
I know MacArthur used a 1920's Parker Duofold to sign his part of the end of WWII.
No offense, but I guess I've been around enough people (and snobs) in pen shops who have complained about their newer Mont Blancs having problems or breaking. Sure, Mont Blanc always repairs them for free, but I'd rather have a pen (especially for that much money) which didn't need to go back to the manufacturer at all. My understanding is that vintage Mont Blanc pens are incredible pens that are very well made with exceptional materials, but I've been given the general impression that new vs. old Mont Blanc pens is sort of like new vs. old Stetsons: there is a noticeable difference. Now, if someone gave me a Mont Blanc, would I turn away from it? Not at all, but if I was presented with the choice of buying either a vintage Parker "Big Red" Duofold vs. a newer Mont Blanc, I'd choose the Parker hands down.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not intentionally trying to bash Mont Blanc (I love the looks of the Greta Garbo pen they make) but when you're exposed to a number of very seasoned and serious pen collectors who give you their honest opinions, you can't help but take some of this into consideration. But each pen to his or her own. What the heck do I know, anyway? Despite the love I have for my few vintage Parkers, you'll almost always find an Esterbrook keeping them company in my shirt pocket. And though I love the vintage Parkers, I haven't been as attracted to their newer offerings, even in the Duofold line. Just my two pennies worth.
Nevermind what I say, if your pens bring you writing pleasure, what else matters?
I know MacArthur used a 1920's Parker Duofold to sign his part of the end of WWII.
No offense, but I guess I've been around enough people (and snobs) in pen shops who have complained about their newer Mont Blancs having problems or breaking. Sure, Mont Blanc always repairs them for free, but I'd rather have a pen (especially for that much money) which didn't need to go back to the manufacturer at all. My understanding is that vintage Mont Blanc pens are incredible pens that are very well made with exceptional materials, but I've been given the general impression that new vs. old Mont Blanc pens is sort of like new vs. old Stetsons: there is a noticeable difference. Now, if someone gave me a Mont Blanc, would I turn away from it? Not at all, but if I was presented with the choice of buying either a vintage Parker "Big Red" Duofold vs. a newer Mont Blanc, I'd choose the Parker hands down.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not intentionally trying to bash Mont Blanc (I love the looks of the Greta Garbo pen they make) but when you're exposed to a number of very seasoned and serious pen collectors who give you their honest opinions, you can't help but take some of this into consideration. But each pen to his or her own. What the heck do I know, anyway? Despite the love I have for my few vintage Parkers, you'll almost always find an Esterbrook keeping them company in my shirt pocket. And though I love the vintage Parkers, I haven't been as attracted to their newer offerings, even in the Duofold line. Just my two pennies worth.
Nevermind what I say, if your pens bring you writing pleasure, what else matters?