Braxton36
One of the Regulars
- Messages
- 166
- Location
- Deep South, USA
Mrs. Braxton and I have been looking at an investment rental house recently. It's been in the same family since the 1920's and is sorely in need of some love.
In wrangling with the contractors and architect over estimates, I realized that neither of the bathrooms had showers - tubs only. This is going to require quite a bit of rearranging to work showers into these vintage bathooms without destroying the character. I can't believe that particularly the men who lived in this house all these years (built c1926) never felt the need to install shower(s).
Then I started wondering - maybe they're not necessary? Baths are certainly a vintage thing, but I'm almost exclusively a shower-person. What about the rest of you? Would you find a rental house without showers a big negative (although hopefully balanced by lots of other positives)?
In wrangling with the contractors and architect over estimates, I realized that neither of the bathrooms had showers - tubs only. This is going to require quite a bit of rearranging to work showers into these vintage bathooms without destroying the character. I can't believe that particularly the men who lived in this house all these years (built c1926) never felt the need to install shower(s).
Then I started wondering - maybe they're not necessary? Baths are certainly a vintage thing, but I'm almost exclusively a shower-person. What about the rest of you? Would you find a rental house without showers a big negative (although hopefully balanced by lots of other positives)?