- Messages
- 16,842
And those sneakers. . .
It's true to a degree but unlike the Vanson this jacket has a small D pocket which really accentuates the longer length. With a full size D pocket and a defined waist I think the length would be nicely camo'd or at least understandable. But the plain front doesn't play. I like cross zips at right around a 27" length which is long for the style but anything shorter and I'm a waiter or a matador. And I'm not tall @ 5'11. I'm pretty broad though and that eats up/ pulls up the length numbers for sure. It's really dependant on what's occupying that added length and the build of the wearer. In this case the skinny guy in a long, (relatively) plain front creates a blazer like length, which for me is a not ideal.I think long asymmetrical Perfcto/lancer style jackets such as pictured look slightly fashion forward and incorrect, even on tall guys like me. The Vanson I just acquired is like that to a degree. These things need to be short to fully "work". If an inch and a half was chopped off the bottom of the model's jacket I think the L2 would look better. Maybe they will call the next model the L-2A...
To be fair, I don't love everything about the jacket (and wouldn't really consider that type of jacket by any maker), but I think some of the criticism is bit over the top. I don't think anyone threw up in their mouth upon seeing the jacket.
That Schott is so flipping cool.Somewhat agreed but there are several reasons why I really dislike this jacket. The problem isn't entirely in the design for me. It's like, they've just jumped heads first into the D-pocket thing without doing ANY sort of research and came up with something would've been slapped together by any leather jacket tailor working from a verbal description of the style alone. And it's probably gonna be around $800. That's a lot of money for such a messed up thing. There are many D-pockets out there on the market today, and even the cheapest quality makers have this style nailed down, like the Hillside USA. That and the whole taming the style issue... That's why this jacket is almost insulting to me.
Mine too. I love CXL. I think what hurts this jacket is that it's dancing around a very established pattern without going balls to the wall to make it interestingly different. They could've done much more with it but played it way too safe.
They are business catering to young people looking to be relatively cool without totally breaking the bank. Their market is not leather jacket aficionados like those here. They position themselves above mall leathers and people buy their stuff at $500. They could go totally buco with a $1200 price point but lose a ton of potential customers.
Why be relatively cool? Why not be bad mother f'r cool? Perhaps it's something like old man strength. With age you flex your independence... Where the youngsters still want to be part of a clique and not go too far off the reservation?They are business catering to young people looking to be relatively cool without totally breaking the bank. Their market is not leather jacket aficionados like those here. They position themselves above mall leathers and people buy their stuff at $500. They could go totally buco with a $1200 price point but lose a ton of potential customers.
They could go totally buco
That's the thing. I keep seeing the name "Vanson" here and I can see why: I tried on a friend's Vanson CR recently and just had to laugh at how "bad" I felt. It was perfect and I'm getting one. The Gustin job just doesn't do that.Why be relatively cool? Why not be bad mother f'r cool? Perhaps it's something like old man strength. With age you flex your independence... Where the youngsters still want to be part of a clique and not go too far off the reservation?