TheSnark
One of the Regulars
- Messages
- 124
- Location
- S. Arizona, US
Naked leather is very supple and has a soft, buttery feel right out of the box. It doesn't require any break-in at all. FCL leather is full-grain, so it has a nice, pebbly grain when new, but the grain tends to fade over the years, leaving a smooth, dull surface (at least, the fading is quite noticable on both my FCL jackets). FCL jackets tend to be heavyweight and are well-built... very rugged, and fit is true to modern sizing (FCL is not a vintage repro shop in any respect). Over the years, I've recieved many nice comments on my FCL jackets, and several inquiries from riders about where I got them.OneEyeMan said:Could somebody tell me about FCL's naked leather please?
I haven't noticed any significant difference in water repellency between FCL and Vanson leathers.OneEyeMan said:Is it water resistant?
I hope someone else has an answer for that... I live in S. Arizona, so water resistance is not an issue. During summer monsoon season, I just carry an Aerostitch rain suit with me everywhere I go. I treat my cow and horse leathers with Lexol twice/year, but the real issues here are heat and UV, which damage the leather.OneEyeMan said:If not, what product would you use to give it water resistance?
The softness and suppleness of naked leather make it slightly more comfortable, and the absence of a break-in period (if you consider that a benefit). Otherwise, the advantages/disadvantages of naked leather are entirely aesthetic and subject to personal preference. Objectively, naked leather isn't really better or worse... it's just different, and it's a difference you may (or may not) like.OneEyeMan said:Are there any benefits to naked leather over the kind that Vanson uses?