LizzieMaine
Bartender
- Messages
- 33,728
- Location
- Where The Tourists Meet The Sea
A one-time regular poster here was of the view that cars made 50 and more years ago were superior to their more recent counterparts in almost every regard. He was adamant in that opinion, and cited old vehicles of his own that had travelled multiples of hundreds of thousands of miles.
I believed him, just as I believe those accounts of old Volvo P1800s with millions of miles on ’em. But for every such example are at least a hundred others in support of your position on the matter. Rings and valves at 50 or 60 thousand miles. Full rebuild at 100 thousand, if you got there. Cars of yore driven in locales where corrosive deicers were applied to the roads rusted out after just a few winters.
The problem with keeping a vintage car is using it AS A CAR. Cars show signs of use. And nothing lasts forever. Very rare is the owner of a restored vintage car who uses it as his everyday ride.
If you're going to own a vintage car, you'd better understand the maintenance involved -- greasing, tune-ups, brake adjustments, all the stuff that's "maintenance free" in a modern car. Either you do all that stuff yourself or you find a local mechanic who knows how to do it and won't bleed you dry. And you'd better stock up on spare parts, because you never know when some random whatsit is going to fail.
And with all of that, you've got to deal with the reality that driving an 85hp car at 40mph is going to annoy the jumped-up doofus in the jacked-up pickup behind you and that he's going to roll coal in your face as soon as he can pass you. That is to say, if he doesn't actually run you off the road and into a ditch first.
I enjoy my '41 a lot. But I enjoy it on its terms, not necessarily mine or anyone else's.