About two inches as a rule. Any more and the trousers need to be recut; a process that requires a competent tailor and significantly more cash.
-
The Fedora Lounge is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.
Dumb Question About Measuring Pants Size
- Thread starter Seb Lucas
- Start date
Corky
Practically Family
- Messages
- 507
- Location
- West Los Angeles
One minor note:
In the old days, when the tailor at Brooks Brothers in Manhattan was measuring a customer for a suit, he always carried a little pad and jotted down the customer's measurements.
The measurements were NEVER spoken out loud or mentioned to an assistant within range of the customer's hearing.
This method was used to avoid the customer's input of what size he imagined that he should be wearing and to get an accurate fitting.
In the old days, when the tailor at Brooks Brothers in Manhattan was measuring a customer for a suit, he always carried a little pad and jotted down the customer's measurements.
The measurements were NEVER spoken out loud or mentioned to an assistant within range of the customer's hearing.
This method was used to avoid the customer's input of what size he imagined that he should be wearing and to get an accurate fitting.
Featured products
-
John Lofgren Monkey Boots Shinki Horsebuttt - $1,136 The classic monkey boot silhouette in an incredibly rich Shinki russet horse leather. -
Grant Stone Diesel Boot Dark Olive Chromexcel - $395 Goodyear welted, Horween Chromexcel, classic good looks. -
Schott 568 Vandals Jacket - $1,250 The classic Perfecto motorcycle jacket, in a very special limited-edition Schott double rider style.
Spearpoint
New In Town
- Messages
- 8
- Location
- United States
It a marketing ploy called Vanity Sizing . It's been common in womens wear for decades and has now found its way to mens wear.
Interesting info-graphic.
Even with these figures, they would completely lack consistency. Am wearing some shorts these days - 3 in rotation. All were bought from Kohls.
One fits slightly tight on the waist, one is perfect while the third would fall off without a belt in a few minutes of walking.
All are 34 in size and my waist is 38+.
"Vanity Sizing" is probably correct. I sincerely doubt that these companies would allow their Asian manufacturers so much leeway in terms of margin of error.
Guttersnipe
One Too Many
- Messages
- 1,942
- Location
- San Francisco, CA
It's also important the remember that, similar to number sized suit coats, a degree of "ease" is -- and should be --built into trousers waist bands. However, at some it becomes dishonest vanity sizing.
An example of proper waistband ease can bee seen by measuring the waist of a trousers point-to-point across the front and then comparing that measurement to the circumferential measurement inside the waistband. Generally you will notice that the circumferential measurement is ~1" bigger than 2 x the point-to-point measurement. If the point-to-point measurements if 1/2 of the stated size, you have an honest size.
An example of proper waistband ease can bee seen by measuring the waist of a trousers point-to-point across the front and then comparing that measurement to the circumferential measurement inside the waistband. Generally you will notice that the circumferential measurement is ~1" bigger than 2 x the point-to-point measurement. If the point-to-point measurements if 1/2 of the stated size, you have an honest size.
Similar threads
