Two Types
I'll Lock Up
- Messages
- 5,456
- Location
- London, UK
Us larger fellows are often heard to bemoan the lack of larger sizes available in vintage clothing. The explanation is always 'but clothing was much smaller because men were much smaller'.
It might be a bit difficult to read, but it's interesting to see this advertisement for men's sportswear from 1925, in which tennis trousers were available up to a 44 inch waist.
It's also interesting to see that they offer a 'combination shirt' which is shirt with trunks attached, to prevent the shirt riding up over the waistband during play. Does anyone out there have an example to show us?
It might be a bit difficult to read, but it's interesting to see this advertisement for men's sportswear from 1925, in which tennis trousers were available up to a 44 inch waist.
It's also interesting to see that they offer a 'combination shirt' which is shirt with trunks attached, to prevent the shirt riding up over the waistband during play. Does anyone out there have an example to show us?
Last edited: