- Messages
- 9,087
- Location
- Crummy town, USA
As I mature, Im looking around and seeing all my peers pair up and start families. While I wish them well, I begin to wonder if I will do the same. I often get those questions from family; "When are you going to get married?" "When are you going to start a family?" I often take comfort in the times we have now when being 30 you didn't have to have a 7 year old on his was to school.
But these thoughts made me wonder about women and men in the Golden Era who didn't have this modern choice. It was expected of them to pair up and have families, yet we all know of that friend of the family, or aunt or uncle who didn't marry or have kids, and it makes me wonder what life was like for them.
I had an aunt, great Aunt Clare, graceful woman, easily could have had 10 husbands, but didn't have children. Perhaps she couldn't. I guess that made her a 'spinster' or what ever stigma Im sure was associated with a woman during those decades. Yet she was the most educated, well traveled, witty woman I knew. By brother and I would often go over to her home and although we were 6 and 7, she never talked to us like children. She would ask our opinions on current events and philosophies (phrased for kids of course), and genuinely listen to our replies. She fueled the creative streak in me. This makes me wonder, am I destined to be this type of woman?
I have no desire to have children, and while this is near socially acceptable now, I wonder how it was perceived in those times. Im not talking 'having as many kids as you can to make into farm hands' perception, but the ongoing 'biological duty' of having children and the 'something must be wrong with you' stigma to people who choose not to have families.
Did people choose not to have families in the Golden Era?
How were the people in your family who didn't pair off received by the family?
Any still alive now?
Im curious to hear stories, or site research if you know of any.
LD
But these thoughts made me wonder about women and men in the Golden Era who didn't have this modern choice. It was expected of them to pair up and have families, yet we all know of that friend of the family, or aunt or uncle who didn't marry or have kids, and it makes me wonder what life was like for them.
I had an aunt, great Aunt Clare, graceful woman, easily could have had 10 husbands, but didn't have children. Perhaps she couldn't. I guess that made her a 'spinster' or what ever stigma Im sure was associated with a woman during those decades. Yet she was the most educated, well traveled, witty woman I knew. By brother and I would often go over to her home and although we were 6 and 7, she never talked to us like children. She would ask our opinions on current events and philosophies (phrased for kids of course), and genuinely listen to our replies. She fueled the creative streak in me. This makes me wonder, am I destined to be this type of woman?
I have no desire to have children, and while this is near socially acceptable now, I wonder how it was perceived in those times. Im not talking 'having as many kids as you can to make into farm hands' perception, but the ongoing 'biological duty' of having children and the 'something must be wrong with you' stigma to people who choose not to have families.
Did people choose not to have families in the Golden Era?
How were the people in your family who didn't pair off received by the family?
Any still alive now?
Im curious to hear stories, or site research if you know of any.
LD