J. M. Stovall
Call Me a Cab
- Messages
- 2,152
- Location
- Historic Heights Houston, Tejas
We all have fond memories from childhood, but at the same time you have to realize our brains are not digital recorders. And recalling a memory is not like accessing a hard drive. Just think about how the memory is always third person. If they were pure recordings would they not be first person, like a camera? But at the same time the lack of accuracy does not make them less valid or important. This excerpt from Psychology Today sums it up pretty well:
Memory is a complicated process, only partly understood; but research suggests that the qualities of a memory do not in and of themselves provide a reliable way to determine accuracy. For example, a vivid and detailed memory may be based upon inaccurate reconstruction of facts, or largely self-created impressions that appear to have actually occurred. Likewise, continuity of memory is no guarantee of truth, and disruption of memory is no guarantee of falsity. Finally, memory is believed to be a reconstructed phenomenon, and so it can often be strongly influenced by expectation (one's own or other people's), emotions, the implied beliefs of others, inappropriate interpretation, or desired outcome.
So do I really remember climbing through the screen door when I was three, or was the story just repeated to me so often I built a false memory of it? Even if I do remember the act, the accuracy of the details should be highly suspect.
So what do you think? Is it science or psycobable ?
Memory is a complicated process, only partly understood; but research suggests that the qualities of a memory do not in and of themselves provide a reliable way to determine accuracy. For example, a vivid and detailed memory may be based upon inaccurate reconstruction of facts, or largely self-created impressions that appear to have actually occurred. Likewise, continuity of memory is no guarantee of truth, and disruption of memory is no guarantee of falsity. Finally, memory is believed to be a reconstructed phenomenon, and so it can often be strongly influenced by expectation (one's own or other people's), emotions, the implied beliefs of others, inappropriate interpretation, or desired outcome.
So do I really remember climbing through the screen door when I was three, or was the story just repeated to me so often I built a false memory of it? Even if I do remember the act, the accuracy of the details should be highly suspect.
So what do you think? Is it science or psycobable ?