StanleyVanBuren
Registered User
- Messages
- 409
- Location
- Pacific Palisades, CA
The legal fraternity of which I am a member arranged to have a representative from the Brooks Brothers in Century City come out to the law school to give a talk on basic work wardrobe for lawyers starting out at a firm.
After the usual sales pitch, I got into a conversation with the guy about some of the stuff he'd presented. Then, I learn that first, he left the pocket square out of all his presentations because he thinks its "doing too much," and that he prefers to show NO cuff. I told him it looked like his sleeves were cut too short or that his jacket was unfinished, or both. He agreed but asserted that it was a matter of personal preference. I almost gave up right there.
But I had to ask about the armholes. Well, as expected he claims to prefer a loose-fitting, low armhole suit jacket. Ugh. But, he did say that their top of the line suits are moving away from this and now come with much higher-cut armholes. I'll believe it when I see it, but if he's right, at least it's an indication that they're moving in the right direction.
After the usual sales pitch, I got into a conversation with the guy about some of the stuff he'd presented. Then, I learn that first, he left the pocket square out of all his presentations because he thinks its "doing too much," and that he prefers to show NO cuff. I told him it looked like his sleeves were cut too short or that his jacket was unfinished, or both. He agreed but asserted that it was a matter of personal preference. I almost gave up right there.
But I had to ask about the armholes. Well, as expected he claims to prefer a loose-fitting, low armhole suit jacket. Ugh. But, he did say that their top of the line suits are moving away from this and now come with much higher-cut armholes. I'll believe it when I see it, but if he's right, at least it's an indication that they're moving in the right direction.