Fletch
I'll Lock Up
- Messages
- 8,865
- Location
- Iowa - The Land That Stuff Forgot
Mansfield's definition has too much wiggle room. "Confidence and command in a situation of risk" invites men to foolhardiness (from misplaced confidence in the situation) and domineering (from a misplaced urge to command).
We'd do better to add a word cultural conservatives like Mansfield tend to shy away from: self. "Self-confidence and command of oneself in a situation of risk" defines a person who will conduct emself just as resolutely, but more reliably and with more dignity for everyone.
Leaving aside times when it's necessary to assert authority - and I think anyone really concerned with others will recognize those times - what's the matter with that?
AIU Mansfield, he would probably say it's too degendered. That a man is someone who must have an innate drive to leadership - that he must not have just a calling or a resolution to lead, but an urge. Something physical and competitive and "for itself." That this is what makes heroes and movements and inspires people in powerful ways.
It makes me uneasy, not least because I don't have it and don't want it.
We'd do better to add a word cultural conservatives like Mansfield tend to shy away from: self. "Self-confidence and command of oneself in a situation of risk" defines a person who will conduct emself just as resolutely, but more reliably and with more dignity for everyone.
Leaving aside times when it's necessary to assert authority - and I think anyone really concerned with others will recognize those times - what's the matter with that?
AIU Mansfield, he would probably say it's too degendered. That a man is someone who must have an innate drive to leadership - that he must not have just a calling or a resolution to lead, but an urge. Something physical and competitive and "for itself." That this is what makes heroes and movements and inspires people in powerful ways.
It makes me uneasy, not least because I don't have it and don't want it.
Last edited: