Tony in Tarzana
My Mail is Forwarded Here
- Messages
- 3,276
- Location
- Baldwin Park California USA
Jeez, fellows, eat something for heaven's sake!
jeep44 said:I'm a Civil War reenactor, and I'm one of only 2 or 3 in the group that wear 'issue' sized uniforms (there were only four basic issue sizes then). I'm 5'7",140 lbs,almost exactly the median size as a real CW soldier, but I'm the smallest guy in the group.
Absolutely but how many folks can you get that look like battle-worn, under fed, tired, discouraged troops just on certain weekends a month? When I was younger & in much better shape, we went as authentic as possible, sleeping in trenches, hard-tack & canteen water for days. We looked pretty ragged at the end of the event but we had to mingle with polite society back at work. To be able to afford reenacting typically requires somebody who is making a good salary & enjoying the fruits of that lifestyle. JMHOfilfoster said:This is an interesting thread, especially to military and uniform historians and collectors. Lots of exceptions can be seen in photos but the general idea of smaller sized men of military age in the Civil War -WWII seems like a settled thing. Whatever combination of diet, genetics and/or and lack of exercise has so dramatically changed this, is also interesting.
Re reenacting: Doesn't this mean that for most reenacting purposes, your generously sized, modern-day citizen of whatever nationality now, is really not an accurate portrayal? He's (OK and 'she's') too well fed and healthy looking. I have heard this is a major point of controversy in the 'authentics' camp of reenactors who strive for authenticity, especially for photographic purposes.
filfoster said:Re reenacting: Doesn't this mean that for most reenacting purposes, your generously sized, modern-day citizen of whatever nationality now, is really not an accurate portrayal? He's (OK and 'she's') too well fed and healthy looking. I have heard this is a major point of controversy in the 'authentics' camp of reenactors who strive for authenticity, especially for photographic purposes.
Tony in Tarzana said:Yep, the only WWII re-enacting role I could play is Hermann Goering. lol
filfoster said:This is an interesting thread, especially to military and uniform historians and collectors. Lots of exceptions can be seen in photos but the general idea of smaller sized men of military age in the Civil War -WWII seems like a settled thing. Whatever combination of diet, genetics and/or and lack of exercise has so dramatically changed this, is also interesting.
Re reenacting: Doesn't this mean that for most reenacting purposes, your generously sized, modern-day citizen of whatever nationality now, is really not an accurate portrayal? He's (OK and 'she's') too well fed and healthy looking. I have heard this is a major point of controversy in the 'authentics' camp of reenactors who strive for authenticity, especially for photographic purposes.
Corky: Sometimes, it's just better not to know...like making sausage, to use another meat metaphor. Now, pass me the salt...Corky said:Consider things like Growth Hormones in Beef, which have been introduced since WW II.
Since the 1950's the meat industry has been adding growth hormones to cattle feed to maximize the weight of their cattle. The kids of America eat the hormone-rich beef and entire generations of kids gets bigger than their parents.
Lots of similar chemical changes have been introduced at stages all along the food chain.
Look at the faces of the guys in those photos from the Civil War. Those are the faces of kids who ate food fresh from the farm, meat from animals that they raised themselves.
People who grew up in the last half century have been consuming processed food with many more artificial ingredients that were unknown to Billy Yank or Johnny Reb.
For a bit more on this topic (and I apologize in advance if it makes you lose your appetite), but check out this article from today's NY Times on the use of ammonia in beef processing:
Safety of Beef Processing Method Is Questioned
Best of luck...