- Messages
- 19,001
- Location
- Central California
Greetings, Gentlemen,
I appreciate your comments, and thoughts, very much! When considering the content of my Mallory, I took into account two things: one, was that this hat looks to have been made in the 1940-1950 time period, and the other is that the feel, or "hand" of this hat, when compared to my oldest Stetsons, is the same, which meant "fur felt", to me. I own only one wool Stetson, which I bought in an antique store for very, very little money, and this hat most certainly feels like wool, and not felt. I'll try to post some photos of my Mallory, so you can see what I got. Wore it yesterday, to the Post Office, and the store, and got lots of compliments, which is nice! Please note that, besides the one of me wearing this hat, were all taken before I cleaned and brushed it. So, they do show some dust and dirt. A quick brushing and wiping took care of most of that.
View attachment 147617
View attachment 147618
View attachment 147619
View attachment 147620
View attachment 147621
View attachment 147622
View attachment 147623
View attachment 147624
View attachment 147627
Thanks for checking out the photos, and I hope they can help in dating the hat, and shining more light on it's contents. In any case, I like it quite a bit, and am very happy to have found it. For $35, I think it is well worth owning and wearing! Thanks, again, and God Bless!
Every Good Wish,
Doc
I’ve seen hats made from Durafelt that had content tags of 90% wool and 10% unspecified fur. Amazon sells new Durafelt hats for under $15 and I’m sure they are not 100% fur felt. Your hat looks to be a completely different breed and I wouldn’t be surprised if it was 100% fur felt. It looks like there is no one answer for what Durafelt is.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro