Matt Deckard
Man of Action
- Messages
- 10,046
Orgetorix said:Fixed that for you.
Irony.
Orgetorix said:Fixed that for you.
Wolfmanjack said:Evan and others, thank you for your informative replies.
It was worth the 4-year wait.
Evan Everhart said:...I can't stand the man! He just strikes me as rather vapid and lax in most things...
(ARGH! I'm still off topic!) Has someone set up a Prince Charles: Like or Dislike thread? They should!...
.... The military for parade and such is one thing, they have no choice, but he's a lax nobleman who does next to nothing!
Maybe it's just me because he rubs me the wrong way as far as anything else with him, but I don't particularly like his style or the fact that everything looks so over-pressed. It looks like he's trying too hard.
I've just started a discussion thread on old Chazzy-boy:
http://www.thefedoralounge.com/showthread.php?t=45652
Good point. And I assure you--it's not because I'm a great fan of the current President, by any means! It is the office, or position, that should be respected.Mysterious Mose said:If I said this about your President I'd be suspended. [huh]
Is it me or did the lady to his left stick her finger in a light socket?Tomasso said:
Yeah, but it is just that elegant little touch.Marc Chevalier said:In the end, it's just a long strip of white cloth -- nearly the width of ticker tape-- with a series of buttonholes in it.
.
draws said:Is it me or did the lady to his left stick her finger in a light socket?
Mysterious Mose said:If I said this about your President I'd be suspended. [huh]
Evan Everhart said:I'm off topic here (again) but, Charles is usually dressed alright as to the actual garments, but the way that he wears them is sometimes so appalling! He lacks any actual style in the way that he wears his garments. He is not a stylish man and a gentleman is after all differentiated from an ordinary man by the way in which he wears his garments. I think a lot of those garments were inherited or his tailors picked out and designed them en toto.
I can't stand the man! He just strikes me as rather vapid and lax in most things. Come on! He showed up in a morning coat with a crease ironed into the front of the sleeve! It's just WRONG! The clothes looking like they are new is beyond tasteless.
This said, the slip is rather nice and good pic of one!
Brummagem Joe said:......With all due respect don't be ridiculous........he's probably the most consistently best dressed and most stylish man in the world for nearly forty years.......whether it's laying out gardens, choosing appropriate architecture, cutting peat, or choosing a suit, he invariably displays perfect taste......I happened to be in the UK a few weeks ago and he popped up on an antiques show being held in almost perfect Adam house packed with Chippendale furniture that he'd orchestrated the rescue of.....apart from the beauty of his surroundings he was perfectly dressed in a double breasted large houndstooth jacket worn with toning trousers and French cuffed shirt......the effect as ever was stylish but comfortable elegance.
Now, Now gentlemen. I appreciate everyone's opinion here and would hope that we now get down to the business of appropriate attire, etal. I too find that today's standards are more mundane than the styles of let's say more than two generations ago and it is irksome to see presidents and heads of state slouching through or diddley-bopping around like they were some cool dude. It takes away from their role of being leaders and spokesmen for their respective nations. Of the three heads of state mentioned, I give a thumbs up to Charles. At least he tries and his is an aire of dignity compared to the "other two" names mentioned. Just my two cents.Evan Everhart said:I am entitled to my own opinion. I simply don't like his choice in colour pallet or his choice in low cut Kent or Windsor (whichever name one chooses to apply to them) DB suits for many years, or his choice of plaids often enough (for his DB suits et al), or the heavy creases in the coat-sleeves of his Morning Coats, or his choice in women. In other respects, he is appropriate if not necessarily stylish in a manner which I like, would emulate, or consider stylish in his (or anyone else's) clothing. I've never said that he was not appropriately dressed, merely that I do not and cannot approve of his sense of style as it is rather bland and banal by my standards and in comparison to the styles of several of his fore-bearers. I dislike the man on a personal level for his personal life, for his breaking up his marriage as he did. Why? When one has children, one should avoid breaking up one's family. It's a rotten deal, especially for a possible future figure-head of state, that was a particular injudicious and inappropriate action not suited to the dignity of his public role.
draws said:Now, Now gentlemen. I appreciate everyone's opinion here and would hope that we now get down to the business of appropriate attire, etal. I too find that today's standards are more mundane than the styles of let's say more than two generations ago and it is irksome to see presidents and heads of state slouching through or diddley-bopping around like they were some cool dude. It takes away from their role of being leaders and spokesmen for their respective nations. Of the three heads of state mentioned, I give a thumbs up to Charles. At least he tries and his is an aire of dignity compared to the "other two" names mentioned. Just my two cents.
Widebrim said:Getting back to waistcoat slips...I actually saw one last night as I was watching Cornered (1945) with Dick Powell. It was worn by a European exile in Argentina, and when I saw it, I said aloud, "It's one of those!" (And I would never had noticed it, had it not been for this thread... )
Evan Everhart said:I think I might just have my tailor make up a waist-coat slip for me while I'm at it.