Well, I'll throw my 2 cents in until someone smarter comes along.
My only Irvin is an ELC, so I can't say how the WPG fits particularly. However, Irvin's as you have read are definitely short in the torso. So if you don't like that a larger size might definitely be in order for you.
Historically, Irvin's were made to be worn over trousers and so fit "generously" when worn without, giving them a traditionally baggy fit.
In other words, unless you hate the baggy look, there's probably a good argument for ordering a size up.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
My only Irvin is an ELC, so I can't say how the WPG fits particularly. However, Irvin's as you have read are definitely short in the torso. So if you don't like that a larger size might definitely be in order for you.
Historically, Irvin's were made to be worn over trousers and so fit "generously" when worn without, giving them a traditionally baggy fit.
In other words, unless you hate the baggy look, there's probably a good argument for ordering a size up.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk