tropicalbob
My Mail is Forwarded Here
- Messages
- 3,954
- Location
- miami, fl
Wasn't it Nick who posted the Aerial?
Wasn't it Nick who posted the Aerial?
Yeah, stealing the Aero labels is so strange. There is no reason I can imagine for that, other than to counterfeit Aero products.
Edward, I have been particularly impressed with your scholarly, insightful comments. What you just said in your above statement is the thought I was attempting to make earlier on this thread. I too have the impression that AL's market share has gradually slipped away after their initial splash a couple of years ago. If Aero had folded and closed their doors in late 2012, perhaps AL might have been more viable, but perhaps not even then. [huh]
It does not look like an Aero, and it looks like he has the cuffs (with the button closure) tucked in.
I know I am running the risk of sounding like an AL apologist at this point but here goes anyway. The whole 'vintage style with a modern cut/twist' thing is omnipresent in a certain sector of 'fashion' right now. It maybe an oxymoron but it isn't AL's invention. Even such well respected companies as The Real McCoy's do it. In fact, they've always done it. A lot of their designs look like almost stitch for stitch repros but they alter the fit to be slightly less boxy or roomy on many of their models.
Many, many companies jumping on the Heritage bandwagon use this term on virtually every blurb for every article they make. It is nauseating but hardly the sole property of AL.
I like the way Mascot handles this: Our aim ... is to revive the lost designs with jackets that will be as close to the originals as possible, albeit it with modern elements, plus as the originals were rarely made in larger sizes, we will recreate them to accommodate this." This is smart, as part of their market will be the guys who wore them 30 years ago and couldn't squeeze into them today.
I like the Mascot site and their approach, it's similar to that of Aerial Star: focused and well-presented.
Great post as usual Edward.
I was interested/ excited at the launch of AL. I'm still very much a rookie in the jacket world, and at the time didn't know anything about the storse debacle etc.
From the get go, the leather selection didn't appeal at all. I'm not sure if it was the photography or what, but they all just looked "off"....the same can be said for the majority of their designs. They might be sensational in the flesh, but even go my untrained eye, they didn't appeal.....
Anyway, the storse has bolted now, and it's probably too late to shut the gate.
The reality is that there are a hell of a lot of people that buy jackets without being members of this forum, and it doesn't look like this debacle is getting much press anywhere else. I guess only time will tell. I can't see any of the new offerings selling like hot cakes, or any of their existing ones for that matter.....I don't know how much benefit they will get from a name change. It's Very hard to polish a turd.
I can't believe that pvnk, and h1ppie are filtered, but 'turd' gets through!
(@_@)
[huh]I can't believe that pvnk, and h1ppie are filtered, but 'turd' gets through!
(@_@)
Yeah..I can't believe 'h1ppie' got banned just because one person came out of nowhere, took offense, and threw what seemed like a never ending fit. Ridiculous.
It's bizarre that on a vintage clothing forum these cultural terms aren't allowed.
If people use them as pejoratives, it doesn't negate the original meaning by necessity.
H1ppie was allowed, and used frequently over the years until just a few months ago.
I guess we better count ourselves lucky there aren't any members who are stunt pilots who take offense at the use of the word 'barnstormer', or any home-brewers who take offense at 'bootlegger'!
How much longer will "Hipster" survive for?
How much longer will "Hipster" survive for?
Hey AdeeC..that's a great imitation of Big J..!!