Gentlemen, am I the only one to whom Badadassi cowhide from Aero looks now quite similar to their Vicenza HH (well, at least on photos, esp. if comparing with Aero's old good early Vicenza photos)? Have always thought Badalassi being thicker/heavier leather with more uneven grain where plain areas were near grainy ones and wrinkles and grains were uneven on the leather surface. To me Badalassi always used to look more similar to that old (gorgeous and quite heavy) Victory HH from BK than to any midweight leathers like Vicenza HH.
Please don't get me wrong, I like Vicenza and Badalassi both, but love each leather for its own adorable features.
Not a big fan making them looking quite similar in a matter of its weight and look. Why Aero's Badalassi now looks noticeably thinner (kind of looking being midweight leather now, almost like Vicenza HH) and looks having quite uniform grain all over the surface than those old good jackets from early The Few Mfg for instance? Is that the result of that Aero's abovementioned "reworking process"? What for? Not a big fan of making such gorgeous full grain leather being noticeably thinner.
Please don't get me wrong, I like Vicenza and Badalassi both, but love each leather for its own adorable features.
Not a big fan making them looking quite similar in a matter of its weight and look. Why Aero's Badalassi now looks noticeably thinner (kind of looking being midweight leather now, almost like Vicenza HH) and looks having quite uniform grain all over the surface than those old good jackets from early The Few Mfg for instance? Is that the result of that Aero's abovementioned "reworking process"? What for? Not a big fan of making such gorgeous full grain leather being noticeably thinner.