Edward
Bartender
- Messages
- 25,111
- Location
- London, UK
That's a good point and I did consider it but I figure w/ zipped handwarmers I'll be ok for storage...for some reason I just don't like pockets inside a jacket. I've had them and never used them b/c I don't like disturbing the lines of the fit. Unless it's a bike jacket, those I'll stuff with every damn thing I can.
Durr, yes... I forgot you were going for zipped handwarmers. That'll give you some storage (not a bad idea, either - I have handwarmers on my jackets because I like how they look, but I've never actually used them at all).
Yeah, what the heck is up with that?? Vanson makes stupid chest pockets, too.
Historical accuracy. Best as I'm aware, those pockets were partly an echo of a breast pocket on a suit, and partly for a packet of smokes (in the UK during the later 30s, approx 50% of men smoked; I believe figures were similar in the US). They do look cool, it's just limiting in size - which is why I now opt for one inside pocket on the right for my phone and wallet.
As for pockets, maybe think about downsizing to a cardholder for cards and notes. I've used one for at least 10 years now and would never go bulky again.
Funnily enough, it was my HWM (bought stock, so no inner pocket) that got me to switch permanently to smaller wallets, as the front pocket on it is just big enough for a small wallet and my phone. The equivalent pocket on my Dustbowl would take the wallet alone - though mostly it goes with my phone, on the inside.
Having said all that, depending on the pocket arrangement, I'd also consider an open inside pocket for a phone.
That's what I do.
Of course, it's all too easy to forget that when these jackets were originally in style, most folks didn't have much cash, and didn't have half the stuff to carry around that we do today.