theres some stockists in california for both brands. IDK if they'd have the full suite of all their offerings though.My recommendation is to get to a place you could try them on, which may be difficult to do if you are based in North America. I've never handled either of these manufacturer's jackets so cannot personally comment on impressions. LL do have a substantial history, so there's that, but recent price increases and "cold, lifeless" looking leathers (on recent jackets) have rather turned me off from that maker as a viable option.
yeah I might, also an addict stockist in seattle where I live off and on so i'll probably try that first depending on their pricing.^^ If you have a way to visit these, may be worth calling ahead (physically call the store and ask what they have In Stock - not what the website says) and try a few out.
Addict Clothes embodies contemporary urban fashion with innovative designs and quality craftsmanship, while Lewis Leathers celebrates tradition and heritage, crafting timeless pieces rooted in British motorcycle culture. Choose Addict for modernity and innovation, Lewis for timeless elegance and heritage craftsmanship.
Addict Clothes embodies contemporary urban fashion with innovative designs and quality craftsmanship, while Lewis Leathers celebrates tradition and heritage, crafting timeless pieces rooted in British motorcycle culture. Choose Addict for modernity and innovation, Lewis for timeless elegance and heritage craftsmanship.
Hello, Large Language Model. You sound a bit mechanical and repetitive. But I am sure your algorithm can be tweaked.Addict Clothes embodies contemporary urban fashion with innovative designs and quality craftsmanship, while Lewis Leathers celebrates tradition and heritage, crafting timeless pieces rooted in British motorcycle culture. Choose Addict for modernity and innovation, Lewis for timeless elegance and heritage craftsmanship.
example? I used to have an ac/dc rag british biker jacket clone from japan that was sold to be "tight" fitted and it did just that.Their “tight” fit doesn’t mean slim. It’s Engrish for Japanese fashion fit.
example? I used to have an ac/dc rag british biker jacket clone from japan that was sold to be "tight" fitted and it did just that.
Sounds like I should opt for an AD-02L from addict then in a smaller size.Ideological bias aside, the LL “tight” fit has an elongated body for the same P2P.
This of course is nothing to frown upon, but just a nod towards clothing preferences for those who feel that tall, slim guys deserve a bit more length without having to go for a boxy fit.
Thurstom Bros. does it as a default option for Vanson stock sizes, a large German retailer for LL only offers the “T” fit, and Y2 offers their Double-Rider in two lengths for each stock size.
Different strokes for different folks, unless your part of the elite group that is “in the know”.
Sounds like I should opt for an AD-02L from addict then in a smaller size.
there ad-02L is longer in the torso than the rest, so sounds like LLs "t" fit as you describe it.I can’t comment on the right fit for you. My rule of thumb would be
- LL fits pretty much true to size.
- for Addict I would size up one (and end up with a slightly larger fit than the LL)
- I would look at the “T” fit from LL if I am of slender build OR just want more length in the torso (because I wer low rise trousers or want my belt covered at all times).
example? I used to have an ac/dc rag british biker jacket clone from japan that was sold to be "tight" fitted and it did just that.
Ideological bias aside, the LL “tight” fit has an elongated body for the same P2P.
This of course is nothing to frown upon, but just a nod towards clothing preferences for those who feel that tall, slim guys deserve a bit more length without having to go for a boxy fit.
there ad-02L is longer in the torso than the rest, so sounds like LLs "t" fit as you describe it.
I didn't say that all Japanese shops use Engrish in the same way. LL's means smaller shoulders and a wider hem. This might work for some people, but I wouldn't call it a tight/slim fit.
There are Japanese jeans I own that are labeled "tight fit" but are wide straight legs. (A friend had to explain this to me; to be clear I prefer straight legs.)
There's nothing ideological about it. I don't have a problem with a Lightning being long for instance given that's the point of the style. There's nothing wrong with the fit itself, either; the issue is the "T" fit makes the hem wider, so it's exactly the wrong fit for slim guys. A lot of people might end up about to order it thinking it'll have a snug hem so it's worth flagging for them.
The reason it exists, I think, is because LL in Japan does not offer MTM customisation like HQ in London does, so you have to choose between a stock size in one of those two fits, but the salesmen really push T. So my Japanese friends who've shopped there, tall slim guys all of them, were talked into the T fit. But upon getting it the hem was way too wide and couldn't change for the original. I know one of them ended up finding a leather tailor to make the hem tapered instead of flared.
Not quite.
AFAIK, the hem is exactly the same in the „T“ as in the regular fit. Of course, it will look different, if the hem sits on the hip and not above.
The Lightning is a boxy fit without any taper. Of course, it looks dramatically different than a V-shaped jacket like the classic Perfecto or else. It doesn’t have an A-shape either, „T“ or not.
Ideological bias aside, the LL “tight” fit has an elongated body for the same P2P.
This of course is nothing to frown upon, but just a nod towards clothing preferences for those who feel that tall, slim guys deserve a bit more length without having to go for a boxy fit.
Thurstom Bros. does it as a default option for Vanson stock sizes, a large German retailer for LL only offers the “T” fit, and Y2 offers their Double-Rider in two lengths for each stock size.
Different strokes for different folks, unless your part of the elite group that is “in the know”.