Thanks, that explains it. I'm not questioning Veronica's beauty or anything, but her body looks so tiny and her head so big, like they don't match. It might be because she's opening her mouth. I have a big head (haha!) but it does look like part of my body.
Thanks, that explains it. I'm not quetioning Veronica's beauty or anything, but her nody looks so tiny and her head so big, like they don't match. It might be because she's opening her mouth? I have a big head (haha!) but it does look like part of my body.
This pic kind of freaked me out:
Paulette Goddard, Dorothy Lamour, and Veronica Lake
Veronica Lake was 149 cm/ 4'1''! Am I the only one who doesn't know this? Or was it common to be that short back then?
^I can't believe I haven't thought of this earlier! Were young women the only ones who wore shorts during the golden era?
Shorts were also I dancer/ chorus girl thing:
That's interesting, I've never thought of it that way before! Pants in the thirties were huge as well. Not till the fifities were shape of your legs truly visible. What contradicts this is shorts and playsuits, but they feel very summery and above all youthful. Please correct me if I'm wrong!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.