Direct quotes I want to address:
"Why is there such a desire, even a hunger, to recreate images from such an unhappy past?"
She doesn't say a fictionalized unhappy past- she presents it as fact.
"We keep alive a secret dream of “a model of routine and order and organization and competence,” a...
I really like the views that differ than mine- it's why I posted this on a forum and asked for people to chime in. I don't like the sanctimonious comments and could do without them. They do more to discredit your argument, at least in my eyes, Baron, than to promote your views to a higher plane.
No, she did not say that. You read that into it. She said:
"How we seem to love and hate those men and women we never knew. What we would give to know their secrets: how Dad managed to come home at 5 p.m. to read the paper or watch TV while Mom fixed dinner and bathed the kids. How Mom turned...
Indeed.
She would have been less sad and presumptuous has she taken ownership of her opinions by using "I" instead of "we." Instead she uses "we" and assumes that she speaks of universal beliefs and agreements on what is or was real.
I don't get when she refers to the people alive in the 50's as people we never knew. What? Everyone alive then is now dead? lol I'm always asking older people about the 50's- leads to geat conversations!
I understand what you are saying and agree with your last point. I don't agree with the author's version of what was real then, though, both positive and negative.
What about all of the housewives of today? They MUST be miserable if they have nice eyebrows and keep an orderly house. I just get so agitated by these faux feministic rants that demean a valid and lovely lifestyle choice.
I just read this Op-Ed in the NY Times:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/30/opinion/30warner.html?_r=2
I am very irked by this commentary. The author uses the following to describe the fifties:
"sad and sordid sexual repression, the infantilization of women, the cookie-cutter conformity"...
Thanks, but I have something similar to those and use them for my face-those are oil absorbing. The lipstick tissues these are pretty much just plain 'ol tissues but the right size for purses and lipstick blotting!
There's an ongoing vintage perfume thread, and those are all name brand respectable perfumes that might be mentioned in it (and not so cheap). I got this box from a local antique shop. :) The perfumes have crazy names, I will write some later, need to run, long day ahead (sick pet.)...
I just tried about five of them. One smells like freshly waxed kitchen floors with cookies baking. lol They must have been after the housewife demographic. Another smells like a husband home late with his secretary's perfume on his collar (I'm serious, how could I make something so crazy up)...
Today I bought a box of mini no-name brand "Parfums De France" by Charles V. I think what you have is steps above...but I think like many things, low-budget vintage is often top shelf by today's standards...I want to start wearing cheap perfume! lol
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.