I just finished reading "Fashion is Spinach", Elizabeth Hawes' 1941(?) book about trying to singlehandedly create an American fashion design industry in the late 20s and 30s. (I think I was hipped to this book on these boards actually). It is surprising to read how she absolutely *savages* women's mass-produced/department store clothes of the 30s as being rubbish (the book has gone back to the library but I vividly remember the line, "material you could shoot peas through").
I think the only way to properly answer this question is buy more vintage clothes from a wider spectrum of eras and mount a serious in-depth study of any possibly quality variations. Yep yep.
Yes, I'd say it definitely was a direct result of the war. When such a thing happens people are sort of reborn again I believe. After the war the majority must have wanted everything to be different so to forget the past and move on forward and as a result of that everything from fashion, music, politics, eating habits and relationships changed. Yet I don't think the fashion quality was a decline, it just took a new turn as fashion always does.
I do prefer the fashion and the fabrics of the golden era, in particular to the fabric materials in the 50's- 70's, but those fragile silk underwear, blouses and the custom-made clothing weren't suited for the post war society and the "modern thinking" people. Since it just couldn't go on like it used to it simply can't be a decline. A decline would have been to keep the fabrics and the clothing and still continue developing peoples way of living and society. Best to stop when things are at their best.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.