Want to buy or sell something? Check the classifieds
  • The Fedora Lounge is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

Suit Question

SGT Rocket

Practically Family
Messages
600
Location
Twin Cities, Minn
Ok, I don't post much and I lurke a little more.

So here is my question. I was just looking at the thread: 1940 Spring/Summer Mont. Ward suits

And, I noticed a lot of the mens' suits from that period seem to have a "high" waistline. Like, it looks like to me that the belt is up around the navel. Is this a stylistic feature, or is this how a suite is always worn, even today? It looks like the pants might be across the navel or over the navel.

See, I've been away from home for a while and when I get back I'll be looking for a job. It will most likely be a federal position so I'll probably be wearing suits every day. I'd like to do it with some style and a little old-school. I love suits from the 1940's and 1950's so that will be the look I'm going for.

Any advice would be great!!!!!!

Thanks! :D
 

Not-Bogart13

Call Me a Cab
Messages
2,501
Location
NE Pennsylvania
Trousers were worn a bit higher in earlier decades. It was part of the fashion. I'm starting to see a bit of that coming around again, but it's not widely seen today.
 

thunderw21

I'll Lock Up
Messages
4,044
Location
Iowa
Yes, high waisted trousers were the style in the 1930s-1950s. Usually navel height or higher.

I find high waisted trousrs much more comfortable than modern low waisted ones. Give it a try sometime and see how you like it.
 

Lokar

A-List Customer
Messages
383
Location
Nowhere
They were actually worn on the waist or higher (rather than the hips, as many trousers, including all suit trousers I've seen in Sweden, are worn today). Hence the waistband of the trousers.

It's shocking how many people (especially men) can't place their waist, and think it's pretty much the top part of the hips.
 

Bugsy

One Too Many
Messages
1,126
Location
Sacramento/San Francisco Bay Area
thunderw21 said:
Yes, high waisted trousers were the style in the 1930s-1950s. Usually navel height or higher.

I find high waisted trousrs much more comfortable than modern low waisted ones. Give it a try sometime and see how you like it.

Thunder, as always, is perfectly correct in this. High-waisted trousers are much more comfortable and look much nicer.
 

tbrunke

Familiar Face
Messages
76
Location
Denver, CO
Bugsy said:
Thunder, as always, is perfectly correct in this. High-waisted trousers are much more comfortable and look much nicer.

Does' anyne know what brands can you buy that "ride high"?
 

thunderw21

I'll Lock Up
Messages
4,044
Location
Iowa
tbrunke said:
Does' anyne know what brands can you buy that "ride high"?

Few if any OTR are truly high waisted. Some of the best I've seen (completely relative, mind you) are George brand and Ralph Lauren.

If you want truly high waisted trousers have some custom made or go with vintage.
 

KeyGrip

A-List Customer
Messages
465
Location
Santa Cruz, CA
tbrunke said:
Does' anyne know what brands can you buy that "ride high"?

Dickies regular work pants have fairly high waists. Very comfortable, but not the most formal article of clothing available.
 

SGT Rocket

Practically Family
Messages
600
Location
Twin Cities, Minn
Wheres my waist?

Lokar said:
They were actually worn on the waist or higher (rather than the hips, as many trousers, including all suit trousers I've seen in Sweden, are worn today). Hence the waistband of the trousers.

It's shocking how many people (especially men) can't place their waist, and think it's pretty much the top part of the hips.


Hmmm, you know I'm not sure where MY waste is! lol

I kind of have my belt around the fat part of my navel. Or rather the fat part around my mid section, that happens to be around my navel. So the suite pants should be just above my navel?
 

anon`

One Too Many
The natural waist is at--or around--the navel. That is where dress trousers should be worn. It's also where a jacket's middle button (or pair thereof) should be located. It's a natural bisection of the upper and lower body.

Honestly (and particularly when worn with a belt), trousers stay up much more comfortably when worn at that height. Plus you look better ;)
 

SGT Rocket

Practically Family
Messages
600
Location
Twin Cities, Minn
comfort

You know, it does seem to me that my pants would be a little more comfortable around my navel. I'm a little on the chubby side (but not too chubby) and the next time I go in to get a suite altered, I'll see what they can do with bringing the pants up.
 

Johnny J

Call Me a Cab
Messages
2,115
Location
Panama City, Florida
Magnoli Hollywood Waist Trousers

Does anyone own a pair of these hollywood waist trousers that Magnoli Clothiers sells? I would like to see some pics if possible, cause the pics on the website don't look too great. Might be just the way they took the pics. I am concerned about how long the rise and the zipper is. Also, how wide the pants are.
 

Atinkerer

One of the Regulars
Messages
123
Location
Brooklyn, NY, USA
I don't think I have a waist :(

HI,

I'm a bit wider in the middle than I am at both ends, so if I belted my pants at the navel they'd slip down and I'd have to walk around with one hand holding up my pants all the time.

Is there a trick to wearing pants navel high?

I've always worn my pants so that the belt keeps the pants from sliding down over my hip bones.

What am I doing wrong here?

Tony
 

Tomasso

Incurably Addicted
Messages
13,719
Location
USA
Atinkerer said:
I'm a bit wider in the middle than I am at both ends.......Is there a trick to wearing pants navel high?
Braces/suspenders. ;)
capture.jpg
 

Forum statistics

Threads
108,962
Messages
3,071,630
Members
54,012
Latest member
Nikolaus23
Top