Want to buy or sell something? Check the classifieds
  • The Fedora Lounge is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

Striking a pose?

Flicka

One Too Many
Messages
1,165
Location
Sweden
I've been looking at quite a lot of old photos of everyday women lately, and something struck me. If you look at ladies from the first half of the 1920s, they tend to stand very ungracefully; feet wide apart and angled out. Comfortably, rather than in a way calculated to make their legs look good. Ten years later, they're all posing in quite a different and much more sophisticated way. At first I thought it was just an aesthetic preference, but then I thought, maybe it's a remnant from the longer skirts that most of those women had grown up with? Or is it just a matter of being more used to cameras?

Did anyone else notice this or am I imagining things?
 

therizyflapper

One of the Regulars
Messages
264
Location
thousand oaks CA
I've been looking at quite a lot of old photos of everyday women lately, and something struck me. If you look at ladies from the first half of the 1920s, they tend to stand very ungracefully; feet wide apart and angled out. Comfortably, rather than in a way calculated to make their legs look good. Ten years later, they're all posing in quite a different and much more sophisticated way. At first I thought it was just an aesthetic preference, but then I thought, maybe it's a remnant from the longer skirts that most of those women had grown up with? Or is it just a matter of being more used to cameras?

Did anyone else notice this or am I imagining things?

i could definitely see what you are saying :) haha i think how they photographed had allot to do with how unused they were to having their picture taken haha :) or like you said they were used to the long skirts and dresses they wore growing up :)
 

LizzieMaine

Bartender
Messages
33,743
Location
Where The Tourists Meet The Sea
I think the long skirts of the pre-twenties era are a big part of it -- when you aren't used to the idea of showing your legs, you don't pay much attention to them. But another thing is the fact that snapshot photography really came into its own in the twenties -- more people were using cameras than ever before, and people got more comfortable with the the idea of clowning it up for the camera instead of just standing stiffly as Aunt Gertie fiddled with her Brownie.
 

Flicka

One Too Many
Messages
1,165
Location
Sweden
Yes, you're probably right. Likely a little of both.

I love 20s pictures precisely because of that. Women look so comfortable in their own bodies somehow, as opposed to more recent photos where they increasingly try to appeal to the camera gaze.
 

Olde English

New in Town
Messages
14
Location
Whitehaven, Cumbria, UK
This is not something I had noticed before but, thinking of my old family photos, you do make a good point! The younger women (my great aunts, all now deceased) who would have been in their late teens/early twenties in 1925-26 when the group shots I'm thinking of were taken have always looked a little ungainly yet comfortable in the way they are standing in their drop-waist dresses yet my great-grandmother, who would always have worn long skirts (but was by now beginning to show her ankles, daring minx!) stands with her feet very close together, as if very conscious of showing more leg than before. I'll have to dig out some more old pictures and compare, because you've got me intrigued now!
 

Forum statistics

Threads
109,197
Messages
3,076,115
Members
54,159
Latest member
14woody
Top