jeff said:I don't think it has to be that way. It's all in HatCo's control - all it takes is someone with the gumption to do it.
Note that Akubra doesn't use the X system, and they seem to do just fine.
My suggestion here is to break the mold. Start over. Be a leader (the Stetson name certainly has the credentials to lead here).
Stetson & Resistol could take the initiative and start marking their hats by fur % weight.
100% Rabbit "The Standard"
20% Beaver / 80% Rabbit "The Premier"
100% Beaver "The Pinnacle"
I suspect the hat industry is just in a funk. They THINK they have to use the X system like its some law, but they don't. If anything - as you say, it HURTS you to use the X system since your competitor can call a hat 1000X, yet it's the same quality as your 4X.
JT you are right that it matters in the western industry.
Jeff I was discussing your previous post with a couple of people and we all came to the same independent conclusion. No retailers would buy our hats if we did away with the X system. I should say that even though a competitor can use a higher X, the quality of their inferior felt can be determined by feel.
The X system isn't perfect but it has been successful for us.
Stetson invented it and we haven't strayed from it. We have been and will continue to honor the mixtures that determine the X quality of a fur felt hat.
It would be next to impossible to what you suggest as far as
100% Rabbit "The Standard"
20% Beaver / 80% Rabbit "The Premier"
100% Beaver "The Pinnacle"
While some hats may be 100% rabbit, you have to then ask what grade is the rabbit fur? What is the breed of rabbit? Where is the rabbit from? etc.... Also is a wild hare and a rabbit the same? The quality of fur is most certainly different.....
So while a 4X and a 6X maybe 100% rabbit they are not the same mixtures of the above mentioned.
Hence the X designation to differentiate a higher quality felt .
I hope I was able to answer your question.