Edward
Bartender
- Messages
- 25,111
- Location
- London, UK
I'll suggest that the guilty parties often reveal themselves for what they really are.
8pm (or 20.00 hours, if you will) at the local supermarket.
It's nearly empty, I'm minding my own business and I turn into an aisle to come face to face with an older (60-70, hard to tell) tall (6') gaunt guy.
Indicator 1) He's wearing sunglasses.
Indicator 2) He's wearing one of these hats.
https://www.priorservice.com/nasevi...MIuISgnvPw3wIVDI3ICh09AAs_EAQYBSABEgKZ3vD_BwE
I look at his hat.
I make direct eye contact.
I say nothing.
I look at his hat.
I make direct eye contact.
I say nothing.
His response: "You don't know me".
Yes. Yes I do.
Seems rather leap based on.... stereotyping? Assumption from a reaction? Either way, unless he was directly engaged in perpetuating a fraud and there was certain evidence of that, I see no point in initiating such a confrontation.
Agreed, but I do like the British act of remembrance for a fallen member of the military, when a relative wears the bravery medal, awarded to member of the military who fell, whilst on active duty, on the right instead of the military left, at a service of commemoration.
If that's what folks want to do (and - one would at least hope - in circumstances where the fallen individual would have approved of the same), I don't have a problem with it.
In Canada we had an infamous incident during Remembrance Day a couple of years back. Buddy wore a full current uniform, medals galore, interviewed live on air by the CBC - never served a day in his life.
His wife was at a loss for words when asked why he wore "his" uniform - AT THEIR WEDDING.
Link to follow.
There'll always be the fetishists and fantasists out there. I remember seeing a similar story or two here in the UK - one was a deliberated fraudster who had taken advantage of gullible and vulnerable would-be partners; the other was just an oddball who never grew up out of playing soldier. The first was a despicable fraudster; the second was pitiable, really.