There's a couple of threads on Brooks already. Here's one.
https://www.thefedoralounge.com/threads/gold-label-brooks-cafe-racer.84083/
The older Brooks jackets were not very well made, used thin and indifferent leather and had a bad synthetic lining. Stitching was often off and crooked, zippers were sometimes ill fitted and the lining would quickly tear.
But Brooks are some of the coolest vintage leather jackets around and my favorite vintage leather jacket pattern. And, for me, they are proof that all the reproductions, with their 'perfect' leather, stitching and workmanship are often lifeless things by comparison.
There's a couple of threads on Brooks already. Here's one.
https://www.thefedoralounge.com/threads/gold-label-brooks-cafe-racer.84083/
The older Brooks jackets were not very well made, used thin and indifferent leather and had a bad synthetic lining. Stitching was often off and crooked, zippers were sometimes ill fitted and the lining would quickly tear.
But Brooks are some of the coolest vintage leather jackets around and my favorite vintage leather jacket pattern. And, for me, they are proof that all the reproductions, with their 'perfect' leather, stitching and workmanship are often lifeless things by comparison.
Agreed Seb. A $100 Brooks CR can quickly eclipse a $1.2k xyz CR and it does it with all the “flaws” you mentioned. There’s just something special about the cut and lord knows I’ve tried to beat it repeatedly and unanimously failed. Sometimes throwing piles of $$ at something in the hopes it will be “better” just doesn’t work. Absolutely the case with the classic Brooks two pocket CR.There's a couple of threads on Brooks already. Here's one.
https://www.thefedoralounge.com/threads/gold-label-brooks-cafe-racer.84083/
The older Brooks jackets were not very well made, used thin and indifferent leather and had a bad synthetic lining. Stitching was often off and crooked, zippers were sometimes ill fitted and the lining would quickly tear.
But Brooks are some of the coolest vintage leather jackets around and my favorite vintage leather jacket pattern. And, for me, they are proof that all the reproductions, with their 'perfect' leather, stitching and workmanship are often lifeless things by comparison.
Does anyone have advice about what to look for in terms of label for classic Brooks jackets? The one I tried on had a label that looked to me to be 80s or 90s. I am assuming this is not what people are referring to as classic, but I am not sure. The gold label in the other thread looks more solidly classic.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yup that looks to be an 80’s Brooks, they went to the red and black label in the late 70’s. That’s a beauty though. Leather is pre-printed era.Does anyone have advice about what to look for in terms of label for classic Brooks jackets? The one I tried on had a label that looked to me to be 80s or 90s. I am assuming this is not what people are referring to as classic, but I am not sure. The gold label in the other thread looks more solidly classic.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
What is pre printed era?Yup that looks to be an 80’s Brooks, they went to the red and black label in the late 70’s. That’s a beauty though. Leather is pre-printed era.
Printed leather. The new stuff appears to be embossed with artificial “grain”. It’s fairly easy to recognize.What is pre printed era?
Thanks. I gotchaPrinted leather. The new stuff appears to be embossed with artificial “grain”. It’s fairly easy to recognize.
I took pics ,but file too large to upload here.
The later post '79 Brooks seem better made, thicker hide, better stitching, stronger lining.
The new ones by a rebooted company are different in details and have an inside pocket and thick 3.5oz hide.