pipvh said:Traditional double-stitched hiking/mountain boots, as modeled by Sherpa Tharkey in Tintin in Tibet:
http://www.thescoutingpages.org.uk/images/tintin/tintin_tibet.jpg
H.Johnson said:Breeks are specifically Scottish, so I think the footwear should be Scottish, too.
Veldtschoen. As Scottish as they can be...
Spot on! It will be for birding, and such mucking about.bburtner@moran said:Looks like you are ready for some upland game hunting?How about the LLbean 16" old stand by...?
pipvh said:As an aside, how do you like your Indian Army jumper? I've been meaning to get one of those for a while.
H.Johnson said:Apologies, I thought you meant breeks...
H.Johnson said:Obviously, habitual wear is different in different countries, but in Scotland the important part of the wiki definition is underlined...
"Whilst breeks are a neater, trimmer fit, plus twos are slightly wider with an extra 2 inches of material to fold over the knee, and plus fours a further 4 inches of material(and a wider, baggier fit)."
I believe that your breeches are 'plus twos' or 'plus fours' which (in Scotland) would be worn with very different footwear than breeks, which are more like 18th/19th breeches in fit. Hence my confusion.
Alexi said:well the ones I have are by Barbour and sold as breeks, I know they are an English company but the Fact that their name is scottish has to count for something, no?
Where does one purchase an Indian Army jumper? Looks great.
so these?Cobden said:I'd personally fo for a pair of brown leather toe capped boots (I know you've already ordered from WPG, but there british officers boot would, I think, be just the ticket - though pukka ones would be better as they are more fitted and arch better and are, on the whole, just niftier)