Want to buy or sell something? Check the classifieds
  • The Fedora Lounge is supported in part by commission earning affiliate links sitewide. Please support us by using them. You may learn more here.

1924 three piece suit

Two Types

I'll Lock Up
Messages
5,456
Location
London, UK
$(KGrHqNHJEoFBmqPesbuBQgDBWbTTQ~~60_57.JPG


$(KGrHqRHJD!FBl,UQ2lKBQgDBolLPg~~60_57.JPG


http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Mens-3-piece-bespoke-Saville-Row-1920s-3-piece-tweed-suit-size-38-reg-/230867365873?pt=UK_Men_s_Vintage_Coats_Jackets&hash=item35c0c46ff1

HBK: You are looking for a 1920s suit, aren't you? In a size 38? Do you like the £950 price tag?
 

herringbonekid

I'll Lock Up
Messages
6,016
Location
East Sussex, England
couple of other curious things;
-the front edge looks topstitched but in the close up it seems it has been pick / stab stitched by hand.
-the facing which inside goes right along the shoulder seam and down the armhole front as an unlined summer jacket would.
 

herringbonekid

I'll Lock Up
Messages
6,016
Location
East Sussex, England
looks like the body lining is rucked up over the lower bit of armhole.
notice where they've added a small section beneath the pocket where they ran out of facing; you won't find Anderson and Sheppard doing that ! ;)
 

herringbonekid

I'll Lock Up
Messages
6,016
Location
East Sussex, England
that sort of facing (which i believe is called 'French facing') will give a very firm and warm front to the jacket which may be the point. it's usually done on unlined jackets (as i'm sure you know) not on heavy tweed, but then i haven't seen enough 20s tweed jackets to know if it was commonly done.
 

herringbonekid

I'll Lock Up
Messages
6,016
Location
East Sussex, England
Q, i've found the text you're referring too and you've misread it. he's actually saying that the wider facing (as this 20s suit has) is the ideal:

ScreenShot2012-10-19at110256.png


ScreenShot2012-10-19at110308.png


...almost certainly a case of older methods being replaced by cost-cutting modern ways which are seen as inferior by the older members of the profession.
 

Qirrel

Practically Family
Messages
590
Location
The suburbs of Oslo, Norway
I should learn to check that what I wrote actually makes the point I intended, before I post it... Of course I meant, as the text actually says, that the narrow facing is "not good form" and the wide facing the ideal.
 

Qirrel

Practically Family
Messages
590
Location
The suburbs of Oslo, Norway
...i think the part he considers 'not good form' is the fact that the lining in Dia.17 is 'plain' i.e. undarted.

Yes, that might be it. (Important to note that it is a cut/v, not a dart.) There is a lot of talk in magazines of the "crooked era" of the importance that the lining is put in full enough in the shoulder so as not to interfere with the shape of the canvas and cloth. I once did the mistake of putting the lining in "plain" on a crooked cut coat (i.e. with lots of stretching and shrinking in the shoulder area), and it showed all kinds of ugly folds in the shoulder area.
 

Qirrel

Practically Family
Messages
590
Location
The suburbs of Oslo, Norway
it's interesting to me that some tailors were still doing a wide 1898 style facing as late as 1924.

A stroke of British conservatism? I have made a couple of jackets with this type of facing, but only because I had too much cloth. Recently I have been experimenting with another style of inside pocket placement and facing which I found on an old dinner jacket. Narrow facing, and inside pockets entirely sewn in the rather heavy cotton lining, placed much lower than usual, almost as low as the outside pockets.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
109,160
Messages
3,075,406
Members
54,124
Latest member
usedxPielt
Top