I agree with Two Types - sell it! Nothing is worse than having a stunning suit in your closet that's to small to wear.
I'm not sure I can fit into this, I'm a 36-37 with loooong legs XD
Hello, I'm selling my vintage 1930s suit. I adore it, but sadly the jacket fits a bit small in the chest and I'm selling it.
http://www.ebay.it/itm/-/231705040763?
Feel free to write here for every detail!
I may be wrong, but with the coat on (which is mandatory in formal dress) the stud and the loop should rest under the collar, so not visible by anyone.
If you mean the "narrow cut" coats, here are some elements that MAY appear (alone or togheter) in a such coat:
- fairly small lapels;
- roundish (but small) lapels;
- slight boxy cut;
- higher button stance;
- small patterns in fabric.
Shoulder construction depends from maker to maker; many...
Labels are not always a secure way to date. It could be that some old labels were used until they finished the stock.
I think, either if the jacket is 80s or 60s, that if it's nice and fits well, the dating it's not so important!
I think button stance is too low to be a mid-60s coat; also, the coat seems fairly on the long side, which is uncommon for 60s ones. Obviously I can be wrong, it's often really difficult to date precisely a garment.
Just thinking... Did 60s coats usually carry a material label? Italian examples...
That is remarkably interesting; I'm often disappointed by the quality of the dry-cleaning, and I think that a dry-cleaned garment doesn't look really "clean". I've ever wanted to water-wash a suit, but never went beyond dreams fearing to ruin the shape of the suit. How do you treat with shoulder...
Yes, I think I have a slight forward-leaning posture but I have some coats whose collars sit very well and stay glued even in extreme situations and they are cut regularly. It's not so simple to explain, in my opinion.
But is there a solution?
I got the idea of starting this thread from the dreaded collar gap issue I've found in a couple of my suit coats. Of course it would be more interesting to talk about all of those other "difficult" fit issues like shoulder divots, collar roll that are rarely mentioned but sometimes can happen...
Not easy to say. But I think sure that those lapels were reshaped from their original shape to the slimmer one preferred during the course of 50s. Look at the gorge angle: it's too wide to be born in this way, just compare with lapels coming from that period.
Dating a jacket only by style can be difficult. Loosely speaking, earlier examples have higher button stance and a closer cut in the torso; more often they are slightly shorter than usual.
The true differences can be seen in cut, especially in shoulder construction; I'll better leave...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.